K.Sudheer Kumar, S/O. K.Sree Ramulu v. K. Pavithra, W/O. K.Sudheer Kumar,

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2349 OF 2014 ORDER:

This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner/appellant under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 challenging the order, dated 20.10.2014, in D.V.C. Criminal Appeal No.743 of 2014 on the file of the IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad whereunder and whereby, the learned Sessions Judge partly allowed the appeal filed by the petitioner against the order, dated 11.7.2014, in Crl.M.P.No.437 of 2014 in D.V.C.No.209 of 2013 on the file of the III Metropolitan Magistrate (Traffic Mobile Court), Hyderabad. 2.

Respondent No.1 is the wife of the petitioner. Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are their children. Respondent Nos.1 to 3 filed the aforementioned D.V.C. against the petitioner and others seeking certain reliefs under the provisions of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005. Pending D.V.C., they filed Crl.M.P.Nos.437 and 438 of 2014 before the trial Court against the petitioner and others seeking interim maintenance and for return of the birth certificates of respondent Nos.2 and 3. Vide common order, dated 11.7.2014, the trial Court allowed Crl.M.P.Nos.437 and 438 of 2014 directing petitioner herein to pay a sum of Rs.15,000/- per month towards interim maintenance to respondent Nos.1 to 3 from July, 2014 onwards and also to pay all the school expenditure including school dresses, books and transportation promptly and further directed him to secure the birth certificates of the children from the concerned authorities in

RE, J Crl.R.C.No.2349 of 2014 U.S.A. where his two daughters were born and produce the same before the Court by the time of completing the enquiry in the D.V.C. Challenging the order, dated 11.7.2014, in Crl.M.P.No.437 of 2014, the petitioner herein filed the aforementioned D.V.C. Criminal Appeal and the same was partly allowed by reducing the interim maintenance from Rs.15,000/- per month to Rs.12,000/- per month. Being unsatisfied with the said order, the petitioner filed the present Revision Case.

3.

After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner prayed this Court to give a direction to the trial Court to dispose of the D.V.C. as expeditiously as possible.

4.

Admittedly, D.V.C. is pending from the year 2013 and most of the witnesses were examined. Hence, without going into the merits of the case, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the trial Court is directed to dispose of D.V.C.No.209 of 2013 pending on its file as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5.

With the above direction, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of.

6.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Criminal Revision Case shall stand closed.

_________________________ JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO 27.9.2016 AMD

RE, J Crl.R.C.No.2349 of 2014 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRL.R.C.No.2349 OF 2014 Date: 27.9.2016 AMD