Smt.A.Srilaxmi, v. Kurnool Municipal Corporation

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD

FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT WRIT PETITION Nos. 20430, 20688, 20989, 21020, 25565 of 2015 & 40496 of 2014 Date: 13.08.2015 W.P.No.20430 of 2015 Between:

Medum Ganesh.

... Petitioner And Kurnool Municipal Corporation, Rep., by its Commissioner, Kurnool, & others.

... Respondents

HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT WRIT PETITION Nos. 20430, 20688, 20989, 21020, 25565 of 2015 & 40496 of 2014 PC: (per the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale) Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Learned Advocate General for the State of Andhra Pradesh, on instructions, submits that respondent Nos.1 and 2 shall withdraw the impugned demand notices and shall issue a show cause notice, as and when petitioners apply for building permission, to show cause as to why vacant land tax be not recovered from them and decide the same on merits in accordance with law.

The statement made by learned Advocate General is recorded and accepted. In view thereof, nothing further survives in the writ petitions. It is needless to mention that the demand notices, in view of the statement made by learned Advocate General, render ineffective. Writ petitions are accordingly disposed of.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand disposed of. _________________________ DILIP B. BHOSALE, ACJ

________________________ S.V. BHATT, J Date: 13.08.2015 ES