A.Venkatesham And 3 ORS v. The A.P.State Coop.Bank Ltd.Hyd.

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO AND THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANIS L.P.A NO.15 OF 2003 AND L.P.A.NO.11 OF 2004 COMMON ORDER:

I am informed that, while dealing with L.P.A.No.14 of 2003, a detailed order is passed, the operative portion of which reads as under: "Unless, the finding of both the Courts on Issue No.1 is upset by us, the question of arriving at a favorable finding on Issue No.2 in favour of the first defendant, who is the appellant in this appeal would arise. We, therefore, do not find any error in the judgment under appeal warranting interference at our hands and hence, the appeal stands dismissed, with costs. But however, since no assistance has been rendered to us, on behalf of the respondent/bank, we direct the costs to be paid to the High Court Legal Services Authority, instead.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall also stand dismissed."

Hence, let there be a similar order to that effect even in these two cases also. Hence, both the letters patent appeals stand dismissed. Consequently, the miscellaneous applications, if any shall also stand dismissed. No costs.

_______________________________________ JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO _______________

JUSTICE ANIS 25.11.2015 sp