Bhaskaruni Ramakrishna, Khammam Dist v. Karukunla Konda Reddy, Khammma Dist
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY CIVIL.R EVISION PETITION NO | 200 0F 2017 Petition under Article 227 of lhe constitution of lndia, against the order dated.13.10'2016passedinl.A.No.31of2016ino'S.No.25of2016onthefileof the Court of the Principal Senior Civil Judge, at Kothagudem' Between:
Bhaskaruni Ramakrishna, S/o. Anjaneya sastry -Age: 36 years' occ: Employee in -rrC"i-.|p"i nliCnine-t ij";r-tf";ii; iJ..-No^4qg' Sarafaka' FUo H'No 10-131' 5ai, pa-iiJ (v), B u rg a m pa h a d ( I\/ )' Kha m ma m D i stri ct'
...Petitioner
AND Karukunla Konda Reddy, S/o. Konda Reddy, f99; 4.7.,yeas' Oc-c: Agriculture' CL ri. NJ.z-r, Lixmipu'rim (V)' Burgampah'ad (-lt/1, Khammam District' ...ResPondent LA. NO 1 0F 2017 c PMP. NO:
3 0F 2017 Petitionundersectionl5lCPCprayingthatinthecircumstancesstatedin the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation oftheorderspassedinl.A.No.31of2016ino.S.No,25of2016dated.13.10.2016 on the file of Principal Senior Civil Judge, at Kothagudem pending disposal of the revision Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI SRINIVASA RAO MADIRAJU Counsel for the Respondent: -----.-'
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.2OO Of 2017 ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject matter of the revision petition rendered infructuous. Recording the said submission, the civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs. SD/. K. SAILESHI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR h-----'
,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER \ To,
1. The Principal Senior Civil Judge, at Kothagudem'
2. One CC to Sri Srinivasa Rao Madiraju, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CD CoPies
4. One Spare CoPY IMIVK TP
HIGH COURT t DATED: 0810712021 q TA Ic s e o;
( q Jct) (i],
ORDER
2 6 JUt202l ,+ i'
\ CRP.No.200 of 2017 * c [) T DISMISSING THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS @)q7r", ).)-\ -{ '