← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/2292/2025allowed no costs

Mandapuram Prashanth Goud v. State Of Telagana

2025-02-24K. Sujana5 pages

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.2292 of 2025 ORAL ORDER:

Seeking the Court to enlarge the petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 3 in Crime No.11 of 2025 of Kondapur Police Station, Sangareddy District, on bail, the present Criminal Petition is filed.

2.

The brief facts of the case are that on 22.01.2025, a complaint was filed stating that the petitioners/accused allegedly entered the complainant's house by jumping the compound wall, armed with an axe and iron rod, and assaulted the complainant's father, Manne Sanjeevaiah, causing injuries. The incident occurred after a quarrel earlier that day.

3.

Heard Sri Palle Sriharinath, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners as well as Sri Syed Yasar Mamoon, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondent - State.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and falsely implicated in the case and

that the allegations leveled against them are vague, false, and baseless, with no specific overt acts attributed to them. He further submitted that the petitioners deny participating in the alleged offence or attacking the complainant's family members and that the case is a counterblast to a previous incident where the complainant and his family members allegedly attacked the petitioners' mother, resulting in a head injury. The mother of the petitioners had lodged a complaint, leading to a case being registered against the complainant and his family members. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant bail to the petitioners by allowing this criminal petition. 5.

On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners stating that the allegations leveled against the petitioners are serious in nature. Therefore, at this stage, granting of bail to the petitioner does not arise. Hence, he prayed the Court to dismiss the criminal petition. 6.

After considering the submissions made by both learned counsel and reviewing the material available on record, according to the remand report, the de facto complainant sustained simple injuries, and the petitioners have been in jail

since January 31, 2025. Since the material aspects of the investigation are completed, this Court deems it fit and proper to grant bail to the petitioners subject to the following conditions:

i.

The petitioners shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each, with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Special Mobile Court), Sangareddy.

ii.

The petitioners shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) weeks, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.

iii.

The petitioners shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.

7.

Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 24.02.2025 SAI

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.2292 of 2025 Date: 24.02.2025 SAI