Theegala Ganga Reddy v. The State Of Telangana

HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE A.V.SESHA SAI W .P.No.4 2 3 3 of 2 0 1 8 ORDER: - When the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that on the complaint of the sixth respondent, the police registered a case in Crime No.4 of 2018 and taken up the investigation. The written instructions furnished by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Raikal Police Station, Jagityal District, dated 09.02.2018, are placed on record by the learned Government Pleader. The said instructions, to the extent of their relevance for the purpose of this writ petition, read as under: - "Except conducting the investigation into the above criminal case as contemplated under law, this respondent police never interfered with the life and liberty of the petitioners herein.

Copy of the FIR is annexed to this written instructions for the kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court. It is submitted that the allegations of the petitioner that in view of the hike of the land rates, the 6th respondent developed grudge against them and approached the Superintendent of Police/ 3rd respondent claiming their land and then onwards the 3rd respondent/ Superintendent of Police calling them to his Office through his constables and high handedly directing them to hand over the possession of the land to the 6th respondent otherwise they will be implicated him in false cases and the 3rd respondent/ Superintendent of Police, Jagityal District illegally visited their land on 18.01.

2018 with his constables and directed them to settle the matter with the 6th respondent and hand over the possession to him otherwise stating that they will be implicated in false cases and that the 3rd respondent by using his official powers again on 22.01.

the 3rd respondent slapped the 1st petitioner and scolded in filthy language are absolutely false, baseless and hence denied.

It is submitted that the allegation of the petitioner that the 3rd respondent/ Superintendent of Police by misusing his powers with the help of the 5th respondent and his constables calling them to the police station regularly and threatening them to sit in the police station till the night hours and the respondents 3 and 5 exceeding their jurisdiction in collusion with the respondent No.6 making attempts to grab their property and that on 04.02.2018 in the morning around 8 am, the 3rd respondent called them to his office through his constable and threatened them to sit in his office and further threatened them to attend his office daily till the possession of their land is handed over to the 6th respondent, otherwise stating that criminal cases will be initiated against them and helplessly, they requested the 3rd respondent not to harass them but the 3rd respondent without considering their request and documents by misusing his official powers torturing them to hand over the possession of the land to the 6th respondent is utterly false and hence denied.

It is submitted that the allegation of the petitioner that the respondents 3 to 5 are not taking any action on their complaints against the 6th respondent is false and hence denied. The allegation of the petitioner that there is every threat from the hands of the Superintendent of Police/ 3rd respondent as well as the 5th respondent is false, baseless and hence denied."

Having regard to the above instructions and taking into consideration of the submissions made by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and also the learned Government Pleader, this Court deems it fit and proper to dispose of the writ petition by placing the above instructions on record.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

______________ A.V.Sesh a Sai, J Date: 12.03.2018 smr