M/S. Nitin Sai Constructions Pvt. Ltd v. The State Of Telangana

[ 3300 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO:4929 OF 2024 Between:

M/s. Nitin Sai Constructions Pvt. Ltd, Rep by its Director Kolusu Nitin Krishna S/o Kolusu Partha Sarathy, Office at. D.No.8-3-1 110/A, Plot No.25, Flat No. 201 and 202, S.R. Laxmi Nilaya, Keshava Nagar, Srinagar Colony Road, Hyderabad - 500 073.

...PETITIONER AND

1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary Energy Department, Secretariate, Hyderabad.

2. The Chief Engineer, Construction TS TRANSCO, Vidyut Soudha, Khairathabad, Hyderabad - Telangana 500082.

3. The Executive Engineer, Construction TS TRANSCO Metro East, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500082.

4. The Assistant Executive Engineer, Construction TS TRANSCO, [Vletro East, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500082.

5. Smt. Kotte Veeramani W/o Veerbadhrappa, Aged about 70 years , Occ House Hold, Rl/o H.No. 4-108, Main Road, Shadnagar, Ranga Reddy District. (Respondent No.S is impleaded as per C.O.22.03.2024 in lA NO. 212024) ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents No. 2 to 3 in not facilitating the work which was accorded to the Petitioner Company vide Lr. No.CE / Const. / SE (Const) I DE-2 ;/ ADEI / F.M/s. Microsoft, Mekaguda I D.No.141123, dt.03/05/2023 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional ;il

lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to support and aid the petitioner for completion of the work accorded to the petitioner's company vide Lr. No.CE / Const. / SE (Const) / DE-2 / ADEI / F.M/s. Microsoft, Mekaguda I D.No.141123, dt.03/05/2023 forthwith without any delay, pending disposal of the Writ Petition pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. PILLIX LAW FIRM Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR ENERGY Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2to4: SRI R. VINOD REDDY, SC FOR TSTRANSCO Counsel for the Respondent No.5: SRI P. NAGENDRA REODY The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.4929 of 2024 oRDER:

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ Petition.

2.

Permission is accorded.

3.

Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn ' No costs.

4.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Writ Petition shall stand closed.

SD/.P.PADMANABHA R ASSISTANT REGIS Y R I EDD T //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1 ?ff 3 3 Ji" %? ?5H t,\iH'"I.)TILf i3,ift \% l?I"'.%* or re r a n s a n a a t l,;l;}::f [li[B:xi"??,8'-?%t,'&:Rft J"'JI,J'i%3roPuc] BM MR v

HIGH COURT DATED:2210312024 ..ri ilAIt o .1 z.

() .5 ? [ JuN 2t2\ i) -j I

ORDER

-\.

nE.'' P.:'

WP.No.4929 of 2024 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS d7 ttd \ o