← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaWP/2714/2017allowed no costs

A.Sudarshana Babu, v. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

2017-01-27A.Rajasheker Reddy1 pages

-THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No. 2714 OF 2017 O R D E R:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue (A.P.). With the consent of both parties, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.

The present Writ Petition came to be filed seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings of respondent No. 1 in Memo No. 31617/Regn. II/A1/2012-4 dated 31-08-2015, basing on which the application of the petitioner dated 26-12-2016 for renewal to practise as notary was rejected by respondent No. 2, as illegal and arbitrary.

It is represented by learned counsel for the petitioner that the issue involved in the Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in W.P.Nos. 9655 of 2016 and batch and the same is not disputed by learned Government Pleader for Revenue.

In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is allowed in terms of the said order. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed in consequence. No order as to costs. _______________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J.

Date: 27th December, 2017.

Note:

The Registry is directed to attach a copy of the order in W.P.Nos. 9655 of 2016 and batch to this order. B/O JSK