Samdani Suresh, v. The State Of Telangana

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF

TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.2087 of 2026 DATE : 24.02.2026 Between:

Sri Samdani Suresh.

...Petitioner/Accused

AND The State of Telangana Rep. by Station House Officer, Miyapur Police Station, Cyberabad.

...Respondent

ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed before this Court for grant of bail to the Petitioner who is arrayed as accused in FIR No.181 of 2026 of Miyapur Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 108 and 85 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (for short 'BNS').

2.

The brief facts of the case are that, on 01.02.2026, the de-facto complainant lodged a report before the police stating

that the deceased is his sister and her marriage was performed three years ago with Suresh and they were blessed with a son. On 01.02.2026 at about 11:50 hours, the de-facto complainant's brother-in-law namely Suresh came to her house and informed that her sister had committed suicide. Immediately the petitioner went to the house of Suresh and noticed that her sister was lying in the hall in an unconscious condition with apparent hanging ligature marks on her neck. Immediately de-facto complainant's sister was shifted to the hospital, but she was declared dead. It is further stated that petitioner had been physically and mentally harassing the defacto complainant's sister since past two years, and on the day of the suicide the petitioner had quarreled with the defacto complainant's sister. Hence, the complainant requested to take necessary action. Based on the said complaint, the police registered a case against the petitioner for the aforementioned offences.

3.

Heard Sri B. Akash Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri M. Ramachandra Reddy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent of the said allegations and the averments in the complaint and the remand report itself does not show any positive attempt done by the petitioner to abate the deceased to commit the suicide and mere quarrel between the parties does not amount to abatement. It is further submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 04.02.2026 and the material part of the investigation is already completed. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant bail to the petitioner by allowing this criminal petition. 5.

On the other hand, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the alleged offences against the petitioner is grievous and heinous in nature. It is further contended that the material part of the investigation is not yet completed. Therefore he prayed the Court to dismiss the petition.

6.

In the light of the submissions made by both the learned counsel and upon perusal of the material available on record, this Court is of the considered view that, the petitioner is in jail from 04.02.2026 and allegations against the petitioner is that he used to harass the deceased on some

trivial issues and on the date of the incident also, the petitioner harassed the deceased. Further, the material part of the investigation is already completed and LW1 to LW16 were examined. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the allegations, the stage of investigation, and the duration of incarceration, this Court finds it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner/accused, subject to the following conditions.

i.

The petitioner/accused shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned VIII Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Ranga Reddy District at Kukatpally.

ii.

The petitioner/accused shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) week or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.

iii.

The petitioner/accused shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section

437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS).

7.

Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 24.02.2026 SRK

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.2087 of 2026 Date:24.02.2026 SRK