B.Venkatesh Goud v. State Of Telangana
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY,THE TWELFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL CRIMI APPEAL NO:460 oF 2018 '
Appeal Under Section 378 (4) of Cr.P.C. against the Judgment dated 11-05-2015 in C.C.No. 327 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the V Special Magistrate at Hastinapuram, Ranga Reddy District Between:
B.Venkatesh Goud, S/o. Yellaiah, Occ: Business R/o. H.No. 11-15-16/6, Road No. 3' Doctors colony, LB Nagar Hyderabad.
...APPELLANT/Complainant AND
1. J. Balraj S/o. J. Ralaiah RVo. H.No. 64, Behind YadagriTheatre Maruthi Nagar, Santhoshnagar, Hyderabad. .. Respondent / Accused
2. The State of Telangana Through Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad for the State of Telangana and AP.
...RESPODENT Counsel for the Appellant: SRl. RIZWAN ALI SHAIK ( not present) Counsel forthe Respondent No.2 :THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court delivered the following Judgment:
I I THE HONOURABLE SRI WSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL CRIMINAL APPEAL No.46O OF 2018 JUDGMENT:
I I There was no representation on behalf of the appellant on I 21.06.2024, 28.06.2024 and 05.07.2024. Hence, this Court directed the Registry to list the matter oo 12.07.2024 under the caption, "for dismissal". Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant inspite of listing the matter under the caption, "for dismissal". This shows that the appellant is not evincing any interest to prosecute the case.
Accordingly, the Criminal Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Miscellaneous Petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- I. NAGA LAKSHMI DEPUTY REGISTRAR / )"-- //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To
1. The V Special Magistrate at Hastinapuram, Ranga Reddy District. (with records, if any)
2. One CC to SRl. RIZWAN ALI SHAIK Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. (OUT)
4. Two CD Copies kulrgh p
HIGH COURT DATED:1210712024 HE SI4 rt'
JUDGMENT
+ r( 7t24 , I () 19 l'l0l/ CRL.APPEAL No.460 of 20'18 I I \ ,+ Oq,Spnr cHFo DISMISSING THE CRI,.,\PP[,.\L FOII NON PIIOSE('TiTION 6o*'u ffi"*