G.Narahari v. The State Of Telangana And Another
t32s1 |
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 1931 OF 2023 Between G.Narahari, S/o. Narshiya age. 24 Years, Occ. Agriculture, R/o. KCR Thanda, (Rangaraopet) Village, Metpally Mandal, Jagitiyal District; ...PETlTlON ER/ACCUSED No.2 AND
1. The State of Telangana, Represented by Public Prosecutor, High Court of Telangana, at Hyderabad.
2. Kollu Raja Goud, S/o. Shankar Goud Age. 45 Years, Occ. Politician R/o. Rangaraopet Village, Metpally Mandal, Jagitiyal District. .. RE S PO N DENT/DEFACTO-CO M P LAI NANT Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the C.C No.372 of 2020, on file of the Hon'ble Judicial First Class Magistrate, at Metpalli, Jagtial District.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in the C.C No.372 of 2O20, on file of the Hon'ble Judicial first class Magistrate, at Metpalli, Jagtial District. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the, arguments of Sri GOVIND REDDY KONTHAM, Advocate for the Petitioner and of the Additional Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.1 and None Appeared for the Respondent No.2 :
The Court made the following: ORDER I I It
KS,J Crl.P.No.1931 2023 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION No.1931 of 2023 ORDER:
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of I I t I Criminal Procedure, L973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.) to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.372 of 2020 pending on the file of Judicia! First Class Magistrate, at Metpalli, Jagtial District, registered for the offences under Section 326, L47, 148 read with 149 of Indian Penal Code 2.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner - Accused No.2 and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent No.1 - State. Perused the record.
3. On perusal of the facts and circumstances of the case, the accused has to undergo the trial to prove his defence and the same cannot be considered and quash the proceedings. 4.
Accordingly, there are no grounds and the Criminal Petition is dismissed. In the event of the petitioner - Accused No.2 filing an application under section 205 of cr.p.c., to be represented by a
KS,J Crl.P.No.1931_2023 counsel, the same shall be considered bV the Trial Court without hindrance to the trial.
Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/-N.SRIHARI ASSISTANT //TRUE COPY// OFFICER To,
1. The Judicial First Class Magistrate Metpalli Jagitiyal District.
2. One CC to SRl. GOVIND REDDY KONTHAM, Advocate. IOPUC]
3. Two CCs to the FUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]
4. Two CD Copies SB B\R i.
\ \ HIGH COURT DATED:2410212023 $E STAIg '.
t, ?.1 tilF$ ?{i?3
ORDER
CRLP.No.1931 of 2023 DISMISSING THE CRLP WITHOUT COSTS 1r[n:
t7 ss(