Br Mngr.,Keltron Ltd.,Hyd v. Br Mngr.,Union Bank Of India,Hyd And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR
Ar HYJ#XBltrE oF TELANGANA TUESDAY, THE NINT rwo riro ulifiii X,?$ [?l ]r?ro.flE.* PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.LAXMAN CITY tvrL co T APP LN s.128 & 1 76 of 19 cccA.N o.128 of 1999 Between:
Keltron Ltd., (Kerala State Govt. undertaking), Manager, Ashoknagar, Hyderabad-500020 represented by its Branch ...APPELLANT AND Union Bank of lndia, rep. by its Branch N/anager & principal Officer, Service Branch, Ramkote, Hyderabad lndian Overseas Bank, rep, by its Branch lr,4anager, Chikkadpally Branch, Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS CCCA.No.176 of 1999 Between:
lndian Overseas Bank, rep. by its Branch Manager, Chikkadpally Branch, Hyderabad .APPELLANT/2NO DEFENDANT AND
1. Union Bank of lndia, represented by Branch Manager & Principal Officer, Service Branch, Ramkote, Hyderabad
2. Keltron Ltd., (Kerala State Govt. Undertaking), represented by its Branch It/anager, Ashoknagar, Hyderabad-500020 ...RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF Appeals under Section 100 & 96 of CPC against the Judgment and decree of the Court of the Vll Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court at Hyderabad dated 28.04.1999 in O.S.No.143 ol 1992.
The Appeal coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of grounds filed in the Appeal, the Judgment and Decree of the Lower Court and the record in the case and upon hearing ihe arguments of Sri Gopala Krishna Kalanidhi, Advocate for the Appellant in CCCA.No.'12811999 and of the Respondent No.2 in CCCA.No.176/1999 and of Sri G. Vasantha Rayudu, Advocate in the Respondent No.2 in CCCA.No.128/1999 Appellant in CCCA.No.170/1999. This Court Doth Order and Decree as follows:
1. That the Appeals are be and hereby dismissed.
2. This Court doth further order and decree that there be with costs in these both Appeals.
SD/.K.SRINIVASA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// e^ SECTION OFFICER To, '1. The Vll Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.
2. Two CD Copies
3. One Spare Copy \ P
HIGH COURT DATED: 09111t2021 \.\ :\.
{ ,:\ eb COMMON DEI )REE CCCA.NoS.1?l & 176 of 1999 DISMISSING ]'HE BOTH THE APPEALS WITHOUT CO JTS . ,art5fi "t).
e,