Ms.Rasakatla Swapna v. The State Of Telangana

[ 33e3 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI WRIT PETITIO N NO: 5640 OF 2024 Between:

Ms.Rasakatla Swapna, D/o. Late Sri. R. Narsing Rao, Aged about. 35 yrs, Occ. Nil, Rlo.7-7561111, Vidya Nagar, Adilabad - 504001. ...PETITIONER AND1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Prl. Secretary, Law and Legislative Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.

2. ThA District and Sessions Judge, Adilabad.

3. Smt. Tanguturi Shyamala, Wo. Late Sri. R Rajender Kumar,.Aged a-qo-ul -94 yrs, Occ. -Housewife, P./o.15-2-425, Ramesh Nagar, Godavar4!t9!i-- gg1?11, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue the direction or directions, more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent No.

2 to provide suitable employment to the Petitioner as a subordinate officer as per her eligibility on compassionate grounds basing on the principles of natural justice,'in the interest of justice lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Learned District and Sessions Judge to provide any suitable employment to the Petitioner in consideration of the application of the Petitioner on the ground of compassionate appointment as office subordinate, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI AKSHAT SANGHI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: SRI S. SATYANARAYAN RAO' GP FOR LAW LEG]SLATIVE AFFAIRS Counsel for the Respondent Nos.

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI WRIT PETITION No.564O of 2024 ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe) Mr. Akshat Sanghi, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. S.Satyanarayana Rao, learned Government Pleader for Law and Legislative Affairs Department for respondent No.1 2.

After arguing the matter to some length, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.

3.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, there shall be nb order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stald closed.

SD/- V. HARI PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// seck6rrrcen To, Two CCs to GP FOR LAW LEGISLATIVE AFFAIRS ,High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT] The District and Sessions Judge, Adilabad.

One CC to SRl. AKSHAT SANGHI, Advocate IOPUC] Two CD Copies BM GJP

/]ti+

\ HIGH COURT DATED:0410312024 1t\E STAT€ ( q

ORDER

oo [ 6 APF ?074 o WP.No.5640 of 2024 s -t gO t ,lFspatcH DISMISSTNG THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS \2 Ceqia) C\grl-