Smt.K.Jyothi v. P.Lekha Manogna

[ 3215 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI CITY CIVIL COURT APPEAL NO: 4 OF 2011 Appeal under section 96 of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree Dated 25.10.2010 made in O.S.No.2103 of 2008 on the file of the Court of the Vlll Senior Civil Judgp, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad. Between:

Smt.K.Jyoth 2, 3, Vishnu i, Wo.K,Srinivasa Rao, Occ: Business, Rlo.l-1-7211 and 2/G-1 and Plaza, Ameerpet, Hyderabad.

...AppellanUDefendant AND P.Lekha Manogna, D/o. P.Vishnuvardhan Rao, aged l3 yrs, Occ: Student, R/o.Flat No.555, Opp.Saraswathi Vidya Mandir, Unnatha Patashala, Vishnulayka Apartments, Keshavnagar, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad. P.Vedagna, D/o.P.Vishnuvardhan Rao, Aged '1 1 Years, Occ: Student [being minors iep by their father natural guardian Mother P Sridevi, Wo late P.Vishnuvardhan Rao, All R/o.Flat No.555, Opp.Saraswathi Vidya Mandir, Unnatha Patashala, Vishnulayka Apartments, Keshavnagar, Srinagar Colony, Hyderabad.

...Respondents/Plaintiffs

l.A. NO: 2OF 201'l(CCCAMP. NO: 15 OF 2011) Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay execution of the judgment and decree in OS No.2103 of 2008 dated 25.'lO.2O1O on the file of the Vlll Additional Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, pending disposal of the above appeals in the interest of Justice. Counsel for the Appellant : SRI MEHERCHAND NORI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI K ANANDA RAO The Court delivered the following: Judgment

THE HONOURABLE DRJUSTICE G.RADHA RANI CITY CIVI COURT APPEAL No.4 of 2011 JUDGMENT:

This appeal is filed by the appellants aggrieved by the decree and judgment dated25.10.2010 in O.S.No.2l03 of 2008 on the file of the learned VIII Additional Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. 2.

When the matter came up for hearing, leamed counsel for the appellant reported that no instructions are received from their clients, hence, this appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending in this petition ifany, shall stand closed.

SD/. MOHD. ISIVfATL qEPUW REGTSTRAR i\j //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. The Vlll Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Courts, Hyderabad(With records, if any)

2. One CC to SRI MEHERCHAND NORI, Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to SRI K ANANDA RAO, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies ADK {A-

HIGH COURT GRR,J DATED:1710312025 6C arA lq, t c (tzo

JUDGMENT

d sorurM {.

i t CCCA.No.4 of 201'l DISMISSING THE CCCA FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS q q ,s I