Mohammed Imranuddin v. The State Of Telangana,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO Crl.PM.P.No.56 of 2015 in Crl.P.No.112 of 2015 and Crl.P.No.112 of 2015 Common Order:

The de-facto complainant and her counsel Sri Amtul Rahman M.H. are present. Accused and his counsel Sri Mohammed Aslam are present.

Heard both sides and perused the petition.

The de-facto complainant lodged FIR No.40 of 2012 with PS Santhoshnagar against the accused for the offences under Sections 498A, 506 and 509 IPC, Sections 4 and 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act and police filed charge sheet in C.C.No.206 of 2012 on the file of XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. It is submitted that at the intervention of elders, parties have settled the matter in respect of offences under 498A, 506 and 509 IPC, Sections 4 and 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act and Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. and entered into a compromise and hence the compromise may be recorded and proceedings in C.C.No.206 of 2012 on the file of XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad may be quashed in the interest of justice.

Having regard to the above said submission and considering the fact that it is a matrimonial matter and parties have amicably settled the disputes among themselves and they are willing to live together and no purpose will be served even if the parties are driven to trial

and following the decision reported in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and another[1] this criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and compromise is recorded and consequently the proceedings in C.C.No.206 of 2012 on the file of XIII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad are quashed.

In the result, both the petitions are accordingly disposed of.

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

_________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J 21-01-2015 Murthy [1] (2012) 10 SCC 303