Bathula Srikanth v. The State Of Telangana

[32s1 ]

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 181 OF 2021 Criminal Revision Case under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C. against the Judgment daled 27.02.2021 made in Crl.A. No.727l2017 passed on the file of the Court of the lV Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, Preferred against the Order passed in C.C.No.141l2012 dated 05.06.2017 on the file of the Court of the Xll Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad. Between:

Bathula Srikanth, S/o. B.Venkatesh, Aged 24 years, Occ. Pvt. Work, Rl/o H.No. 5-99, Lalgadi Malakpet, Shameerpet Mandal, R.R.District. ...PETITIONERYACCUSED 7 AND The State of Telangana, Through Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT CRL.R.C.M.P./|.A. NO: 2 OF 2021 Petition under Section 397(1) & 4O1 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to Suspend the impugned Judgment dated 27.O2.2O21 in Crl.A.No.727l2017 passed by the Learned lV Addl. Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, whereby and where of the Judgment in C.C. No. 14112012 dated 05.06.20'17 passed by the Hon'ble Xll Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad is confirmed.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI VIJAY B.PAROPAKARI Counsel forthe Respondent: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO.l81 0F 2021 ORDER:

This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Section 341 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short'Cr.P.C.') by the petitioner-accused No.6 to set aside the impugned judgment dated 27.02.2021 in Criminal Appeal No.727 of 2017 passed by the learned IV Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, and whereof the judgment in C.C.No.141 of 2012 dated 05.06.2017 passed by the XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad is confi rmed.

2.

Heard.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the present criminal petition has become infructuous. 4.

Recording the aforesaid submission; the Criminal Petition is !

dismissed as infructuous.

u Miscellaneous Petitions pending if any, shall stand closed. ?l i II )l I I I i SD/.T.SRINIVAS DEPUTY REGISTRAR \ i/TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Xll Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad.

2. One CC to SRI VIJAY B.PAROPAKARI, Advocate [OPUC]

3. Two CCs to THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]

4. Two CD Copies PSK.

,l I

HIGH COURT DATED:1710312023 E STAT(- -) 15 \t\[\ l$n r) ,+

ORDER

CRLRC.No.181 of 2021 I DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTSo I ?nTZ