The Commissioner v. M/S. Kwality Construction Engineers
[ 33851
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENW THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA APPEAL SUIT NO: 226 OF 2017 Appeal Under section 96 of C.P.C against the Judgment and Decree Dated 10.12.2015 made in o.s. No. 720 of 2o1o on the file of the court of the lll Addl District judge, Ranga Reddy District, L.B.Nagar. Between:
1. The commissioner, Greater Hyderabad Municipal corporation Hyderabad.
2. The Superintendent Engineer-lll, North and West Zone, GHMC' SerilingamPallY, HYderabad.
3. The Executive Engineer, circle-Xll, GHMC, Serilingampally, e-seva Building Chandanagar, HYderabad.
...APPELLANTS/DEFENDANTS AND M/s. Kwality Construction Engineels, A Partnership Firm having its Office at i-i-Attlo,Ameerpet, Hydera-bad Represeted kby its Managing Partner V.Neelakanta Rao ..RESPONDENT/PLAINTILFF Counsel for the Appellants :SRl. SAMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDY (Not Present) Counsel for the Respondents: SRI M. A. V. S' BHAGAVAN The Court made the following:
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA APPEAL SUIT No.226 of 2OL7 JUDGMENT:
There is no representation on behalf of the appellant on 04.Oa.2023, 18.08.2023 and 15.09.2023. Despite listing the matter under the caption 'for dismissal', even today, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Therefore, this Appeal Suit is dismissed for nonprosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the Appeal Suit shall stand closed Sd/- M. MANJ DEPUTY REGIST AR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The lll Additional District Judge, R.R. District at L.B. Nagar.
2. One CC to SRl. SAMPATH PRABHAKAR REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to SRl. M. A. V S BHAGAVAN, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CD Copies HA/DL gsk
\ HIGH COURT DATED:06/10/2023
JUDGMENT
AS.No.226 ot 2017 I IHE ST4 14.
( e oo (\'r 0 7 I'IAB 20A z );) j.:
./t ,i'
* og,S p,^.r iltJ DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION b J ,l\ \ j 6t w?