Dayyala Rajender v. The Kakatiya Urban Development Authority

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY W.P.No.14197 OF 2011

O R D E R

The case of the petitioner is that the respondents without issuing any notice are trying to demolish the property of the petitioner. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after filing of this writ petition, the petitioner was issued show cause notice and he filed W.P.No.16800 of 2011 and this Court passed interim orders. Further, it is stated, during the pendency of this writ petition, the petitioner passed away. In view of the aforesaid submission, the cause in the writ petitioner does not survive for further adjudication. As such, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending if any, shall stand closed.

___________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J Date: 17.08.2015 dv