Shaik Noor v. The State Of A.P., Rep. By P.P., Hyd. And 3 Others
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER CRIMINA L PETITION NO: 1589 OF 20'13 Between:
Shaik Noor, S/o.Shaik Mahaboob Ri"/o.Bhutai Village, Bazarhatnoor Mandal, Adilabad District.
,..PETITIONER AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.
2. Smt. Anees, Wo.Shaik Noor, Aged about 30 years, Occ:Beedi Roller,
3. Sohel, Wo.Shaik Noor, Aged about 6 years (Minor), Occ:Beedi Roller,
4. Sofiyan, S/o.Shaik Noor, Aged about 3 years (Minor), (Respondents 3 and 4 are under guardianship of their mother, respondent No.2 herein Aelilab#Dist) All R/o.lB, Utnoor (Village & Mandal) Adilabad Dist. RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 482 ol Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records relating to order dt.16.07.2012 in Crl.R.P.No.8 of 2012 on the file of the I Additional Sessions Judge, Adilabad and quash the same. l.A. NO: 1 OF 2013(CRLPMP. NO: 1315 OF 2013) Petition under Section 482 o'f Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in consequence of order dt.16.07.2012 in Crl.R.P.No.
8 of 2012 on the file of the I Additional Sessions Judge, Adilabad. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Lakkadi Dayaker Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No. '1 and none appeared for the Respondents.
THE HON,BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER
ORDER
On 04'03'20 21, as there was no representation for the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption 'For Orders'. Today, despite listing the matter under the caption "For Orders", there is no representation for the petitioner' This is an old matter of the year 2013' It appears that the petitioner has no interest to pursue the matter'
2. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed for default' Miscellaneous PetitionS pending, if any, shall stand closed. SO/.N.CHANDRASEKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR A\_-,.- //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The I Additional Sessions Judge, Adilabad.
2. One CC to Sri Lakkadi Dayaker Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUTI
4. Two CD CoPies.
TL gbr *-
HIGH COURT DATED:1210312021 Ia I 'e q c (.) 25 l{AB 2021 ,.1 -i Ai\7 * L)E -a
ORDER
CRLP.No.1589 of 2013 DISMISSING THE CRIMINAL PETITION FOR DEFAULT.
%"
@