G. Narender, v. The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation,

[ 3303 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE NINETEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUST]CE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 21478 OF 2016 Between:

G. Narender, S/o. Rajaiah, Aged about 35 years, Conductor, Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Ranigunj-l Bus Depot, Secunderabad, Telangana State.

PETITIONER AND The Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Represented by its Managing Director, Bus Bhavan, [Vlusheerabad, Hyderabad, Telangana Siate. The Regional Manger, Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Secunderabad Region, JBS, Picket, Secunderabad, Telangana State. The Depot Manager, Telangana State Road Transport Corporation, Ranigunj-l Bus Depot, Secunderabad, Telangana State. RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring that the action of the respondent No.

2 in not ordering re-engagement with continuity of service of the petitioner as Contract Conductor is bad, arbitrary, illegal, unjust, unreasonable as the termination of the petitioner is against to procedure and violation of respondent corporation circulars and consequently direct the respondents to treat 2nd respondent proceedings, dt. 3'1-05-2014 as reinstatement of the petitioner as Conductor with continuity of service, attendant benefits and with all consequential service benefits including effecting the date of regularization.

l.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 26368 0F 2016) Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner for regularization of his services by treating the respondent No.2 proceedings, dt. 31-O5-2O14 as re-engagement with continuity of service with all consequential service benefits including effecting the date of regularization.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI P.VENKATESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondents: SRI THOOM SRINIVAS, SC FOR TSRTC The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENTVAS RAO WRIT PETI?ION No. 2L478 of 2016 ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as respondents submits that the issue raised in this Writ Petition is squarely covered by the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.183 of 2022, dated t5.o3.2022.

2.

In view of the principles laid down in the above said judgment, the petitioner is not entitled for the relief sought in this Writ Petition.

3.

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. No costs. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/. V.KAVITHA ASSISTANT RETISTRAR h_ sEcfloN drrtcen To, ,TRUE COPY//

1. One CC to SRI P.VENKATESWAR RAO, Advocate [OPUC]

2. One CC to SRI THOOM SRINIVAS, SC FOR TSRTC [OPUCI

3. Two CD Copies BSR GJ -ftqq, ,1x$

HIGH COURT DATED: 1911012023 9l ATS Q5 ?, o}, TY I t ttt\ iii'l ,a _-) + a .t OE5PAs c\

ORDER

WP.No.21478 of 2016 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION, WITHOUT COSTS c., >3, \ t\