Mohammed Nayeem Uddin, v. The State Of Telangana, Through P.S. Langar House, Hyderabad,

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF

TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.2310 of 2026 DATE : 26.02.2026 Between:

Mohammed Nayeem Uddin.

...Petitioner/Accused No.3

AND The State of Telangana Through P.S. Langar House, Hyderabad Rep. by Public Prosecutor.

...Respondent

ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed before this Court for grant of bail to the Petitioner who is arrayed as accused No.3 in Crime No.15 of 2026 of Langar House Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 121(2), 191(2), 191(3), 132 r/w 190 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (for short 'BNS').

2.

The brief facts of the case are that, on 18.01.2026, the de-facto complainant lodged a report before the police stating that while the de-facto complainant resumed his duty on 18.01.2026, performing effective patrolling duties in certain areas, wherein information was received from the general public and from the police station, where the de-facto complainant is working, stating that some persons are gathered and quarrelling at back side of Qutub Shahi Mosque, Pensionpura. Immediately, the de-facto complainant along with Sri P. Ashish rushed to the spot where they noticed that some persons consisting of about 20 to 30 members were gathered there by holding sticks, iron rods and stones in their hands, when they tried to resolve the situation, the assaulters did not listen and instead started arguing. It is further stated that one person pelted stone on the de-facto complainant, resulting an injury on his nose. Hence, the complainant requested to take necessary action. Based on the said complaint, the police registered a case against the petitioner for the aforementioned offences.

3.

Heard Sri MD. Ajmal Ahmed, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as well as Sri M. Ramachandra

Reddy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondentState. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent of the said allegations and there is no such incident occurred and the disputes arose between the parties were only for flying of kites and there is no such enemity between the parties. It is further submitted that the petitioner is in judicial custody since 21.01.2026 and the material part of the investigation is already completed. Therefore, he prayed the Court to grant bail to the petitioner by allowing this criminal petition.

5.

On the other hand, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor opposed the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner stating that the alleged offences against the petitioners are grievous and heinous in nature. It is further contended that the petitioner has attacked the public servant, thereby resulting in grievous injuries and that material part of the investigation is not yet completed. Therefore, he prayed the Court to dismiss the petition.

6.

In the light of the submissions made by both the learned counsel and upon perusal of the material available on

record, it appears that the petitioner is in jail from 21.01.2026 and as seen from the record LW1 to LW14 were examined. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of the allegations, the stage of investigation, and the duration of incarceration, this Court finds it appropriate to grant bail to the petitioner/accused No.3, subject to the following conditions.

i.

The petitioner/accused No.3 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only), with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned VI Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad.

ii.

The petitioner/accused No.3 shall appear before the concerned SHO at 11:00 a.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) week or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier, for the purpose of investigation, and thereafter, as and when required.

iii.

The petitioner/accused No.3 shall abide by the conditions stipulated in Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C. (presently, Section 480(3) of the BNSS).

7.

Accordingly, the Criminal petition is allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 26.02.2026 SRK

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.2310 of 2026 Date:26.02.2026 SRK