Chopparapu Merinda, v. State Of Andhra Pradesh,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR WRIT PETITION No.27 OF 2017 ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. With their consent, the present writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage. 2.

The present writ petition came to be filed with the following prayer:

" ....to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of respondent No.3 in not passing stay order on interlocutory application in pending appeal filed on 07.12.2016 on the file of respondent No.3 against order dated 05.12.2016 passed in RCB.907/ 2016 passed by respondent No.4 and thereby insisting the petitioner to vacate from her land admeasuring Acs.2.37 cents in Survey No.151/ 3 of Pendilapalli Village in Vatapalem Mandal of Prakasam District, as illegal and arbitrary" .

3.

Though various grounds are raised, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondent-authorities may be directed to pass orders in the interlocutory application filed along with appeal, at the earliest. Learned Government Pleader does not dispute the same.

4.

Having regard to the above, the writ petition is disposed of directing the third respondent to pass orders in the interlocutory application filed along with appeal preferred against the order dated 05.12.2016 passed in RCB.907/ 2016 by respondent No.4, in

CPK,J WP_27_2017 accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of four to six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after hearing the petitioner and the aggrieved persons, if any.

Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

_______________________ JUSTICE C. PRAVEEN KUMAR Date:03.01.2017 vhb