Prahlad Tiwari v. The State Of Telangana

[ 32ss ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) IUONDAY ,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 5730 OF 2019 Between:

Late Sridhar Tiwari, Aged About 68 years, Occ Business, Aam Bazar, Yellandu Town and Mandal, Bhadradri Prahlad Tiwari, S/o.

Rlio. H.No.2-4-98, Kothagud6m District ...PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad i# V;l6ra, Muriicipality, Rep. by its Corimissioner, Yellandu Town and Mandal, Bhadradri Kothagudem District ...RES'ONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of lhe constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2rd Respondent in enhancing house tax against the Petitioners house bearing No. 2-4-98, Aam Bazar, Yellandu Town and Mandal, Bhadrari Kothagudem District by highhandedly enhancing the house tax from Rs.6820-00 to Rs.

28996-00 for year commencing from 1st october, 2016 without proper assessing the building plinth area as illegal, arbitrary and violating the Article 21 of the constitution of lndia and consequently direct the 2nd Respondent not to enhance the house tax against the Petitioners house bearing No.

direct the 2nd Respondent not to take any coercive steps against the Petitioner's hous6 bearing No. 2-4-98, Aam Bazar, Yellandu Town and Mandal, Bhadrari Kothagudem District pending disposal of the above said writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. PULLA RAO YELLANKI Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MCPL ADMN URBAN DEV Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRl. N' PRAVEEN KUMAR, SC FOR MUNICIPALITY The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR Writ Petition No.573O of 2O19 ORDER:

When the matter is taken up for hearing today, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to efflux of time, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication any further.

2. Recording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

SD/- K. AMMAJI //TRUE COPY// ASSTSTANIREGISTRAR sEC(#oN oFFtcER To, l.TwoCCstoGPFoRMCPLADMNURBANDEV,HighCourtfortheStateof Telangana. [OUT]

2. o;; iC 6 bnt. put-m RAo YELLANKI, Advocate [oPUC]

3. one cc to SRt. r.r. pnnvLLlNr'rurrrrAn, SCFon MUN|CIPALITY [OPUCI

4. Two CD CoPies BM SB tss

HIGH COURT DATED:1410812023 ,.r'- -..

,J t 1 :- I-.4 !^\ t"-\\ Pil*ii ;.4 .$ ,l C-\:!

c\ ,.,..

')...

:1.') 11.1

ORDER

WP.No.5730 of 2019 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS -4 tl51_\*\-_,