Krishna Kumar Anaparthy v. Mukkapati Veeraraghavaiah And Another
13251 1 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA THURSDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL PETITION NO:2144 Ol 20?5 Between:
Krishna Kumar Anaparthy, S/o Sri A.S.Venkata Rama Rao, aged about 36 Yrs., Pvt. Employee. Rio 3 -98, Kanur Village, Peravali Mandal, West Godavari Dist., Andhra Pradesh-s02 305.
...PETITIONER AND 1 . Mukkapati Veeraraghavaiah S/o Late Subba Rao, aged about 59 Yrs., Occ. Business and R/o H.No.D.401, Trendset Wing, Nanakramguda, Gachibowli, Hyderabad.
2 The State of Telangana, Through P.S. w.p.s.- !.T., Corridor, Cyberabad, Represented by Public Prosecutor, High.Court of Telangana, At Hyderabad. RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the F.l.R. No.9 OF 2023 dated 1810112023 of W.P.S. - lT. Corridor, Cyberabad, Hyderabad, in the interest of justice l.A. NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition,the High Court may be pleased to direct the Station House Officer, P.S., W.P.S. - I T corridor, Cyberabad. not to arrest and / or take any coercive steps against the petitioner in Crime No.9 of 2023 dated 1810112023 pending disposal of the above Crl.
P in the interest of lustice and pass This Petition coming on for hearing,upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M. S CHANDRESH. Advocate for the Petitioner and the Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent No.
I THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER i This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code Ii t of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short 'Cr.P.C.) by the petitioner- !
Accused to quash the proceedings against them in FIR No.9 of 2023 pending on the file of Station House Officer, W.P.S. I.T Corridor, Cyberabad, Hyderabad, filed for the offences punishable under Sections 498-4, Indian Penal Code (for short "IPCJ and Sections 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner - Accused and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent - State. Perused the material on record.
3.
The 1tt respondent - de facto complainant is father in law of the petitioner who filed a written complaint alleging that after marriage of his daughter both the petitioner and his daughter went to U.S.A. and started staying there. However, petitioner came back to India on 18.03.2020 and did not return to U.S.A. when questioned the petitioner to return U.S.A he is giving lame reaSOnS
and he is not joining his daughter. For the said reasons the 1't respondent filed a complaint for psychologically harassing his daughter by not going to U.S.A.
4.
Since the complaint is the outcome of the differences between husband and wife, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the Police to conclude the investigation without taking any coercive steps against the petitioner. Further, the petitioner - Accused shall co-operate with the Investigating Officer as and when required for the purpose of investigation.
5.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. SD/- B. CHANDRA PRAKASH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. Then lst Additional Junior Civil Judge-Cum-lX Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Kukatpally, Cyberabad 2 The Station House Officer, Women Police Station-lT Corridor, Cyberabad
3. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] 4 One CC to SRI M S CHANDRESH, Advocate IOPUC]
5. Two CD Copies vr-l V \
HIGH COURT KS, J 02103t2023 '1tl-i s T4 ,-a .J '-;. '
a'
o (J 15 APR 2[8 OilIIilt rl CRLP.No.2144 of 2023 DISPOSING OF THE CRIMINAL PETITION