T.Gulab Singh And 3 Others v. The State Of A.P. And Another

SMT JUSTI CE T. RAJANI CRI MI NAL PETI TI ON No.9 9 9 0 of 2 0 1 1 ORDER:

CRLP MP No.1 3 5 8 0 of 2 0 1 7 :

This petition is filed by the petitioner/ respondent No.2/ de facto complainant seeking for recording compromise between the petitioner and respondents 2 to 5 herein. 2.

Joint Compromise Memo entered by the petitioners/ accused and respondent No.2 is also filed along with this petition. The said Compromise Memo is taken on record. The de facto complainant and the accused are also present in the Court today and admitted that they have entered into compromise.

3.

Accordingly, this petition is allowed.

CRL.P.No.9 9 9 0 of 2 0 1 1 :

4.

This petition is filed seeking for quash of the proceedings against the petitioners, who are accused 2 to 5 in Crime No.261 of 2010 on the file of the Charminar Police Station, Hyderabad, The offences alleged are under Sections 420 and 506 R/ W 34 IPC.

5.

Heard the counsel for the petitioners; the Public Prosecutor appearing for the 1st respondent; and the counsel for the 2nd respondent.

6.

In view of the Joint Compromise Memo filed in Crl.P.M.P.No.13580 of 2017 and in view of the fact that the provisions enunciated for the above offences, being compoundable, any further proceedings would result in abuse of process of law and wastage of time of the courts. 7.

In view of the above, this Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in Crime No.261 of 2010 on the file of the Charminar Police Station, Hyderabad, are hereby quashed. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ T. RAJANI , J December 20, 2017 LMV