Monu Singh @ Sardar Tejpal Singh v. The State Of Telangana
THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION Nos.2450 and 2466 OF 2026 DATE :02.03.2026 CRIMINAL PETITION No.2450 OF 2026 Between :
Vicky Singh @ Sardar Amarjeet Singh and others ... Petitioners/Accused Nos.2, 4 and 7 And The State of Telangana, through Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad ... Respondent CRIMINAL PETITION No.2466 OF 2026 Between :
Monu Singh @ Sardar Tejpal Singh ... Petitioner/Accused No.6 And The State of Telangana, through Rep. by Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad ... Respondent : COMMON ORDER :
These criminal petitions are filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, by the petitioners/Accused Nos.2 and 4 to 7 seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Crime No.945 of 2025 of Attapur Police Station, Cyberabad Commissionerate. The offences alleged against the petitioners are under Sections 109 (1) r/w.3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
2.
The facts of the case are that the de-facto complainant lodged a complaint before police on 07.11.2025 stating that on 04.11.2025 his younger brother by name Sardar Guruprabh Singh has gone to Bidar on his bike to attend a rally on the occasion of Gurunanak Devji's Birthday and thereafter on 06.11.2025 returned to Gurudwarda to Rajendranagar as rally. In the meantime, A-7 has ridden his bike over the legs of his younger brother and due to which he has sustained bleeding injury and he also quarreled with his brother at Sangareddy. When his brother was present in the parking area at Gurudwara A-7 along with all other accused, keeping the previous grudges in mind, picked up quarrel with him and assaulted on his brother with Talwar (swords), as a result, he sustained bleeding injuries on his head, left and right hands. Hence, he requested the police for taking necessary action, basing on the same, Police registered the case against the accused for the above offences.
3.
Heard Sri Gurmeet Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Sri M. Ramachandra Reddy, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for respondent-State. 4.
The contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that petitioners are innocent of the said allegations. He further
submitted that though the defacto complainant mentioned the names of accused there are no specific overt acts mentioned in the complaint and in the statement of injured witness. He further stated that even according to the prosecution, injuries are only on left and right hands but not on the head of the injured. He further submitted that Injury Certificate filed before the trial Court also shows that there is no injury on the head of injured person, the petitioners are ready to cooperate with the investigation and prayed this Court to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
5.
On the other hand, learned Additional Public Prosecutor opposed bail stating that the alleged offences against the petitioners are grievous in nature and the nature of the offence shows that all the petitioners have attacked the injured person with the swords and the prosecution is not yet received the Injury Certificate to prove the nature of injuries. Therefore, they are not entitled for anticipatory bail and requested this Court to dismiss the petition.
6.
Considering the submissions made by both the parties and the material on record this Court observed that there are no specific overt acts mentioned by the defacto complainant in the complaint against the petitioners and the injured witness in his
statement and while granting bail to A-1 to A-3 this Court observed that the investigation is already completed and charge sheet is yet to be filed. In that view of the matter, this Court deems it fit to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners subject to the following conditions:
i.
The petitioners shall surrender before the Station House Officer, Attapur Police Station, Cyberabad within two weeks from today, and on such surrender, the said Station House Officer shall release the petitioners on bail on their executing personal bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each with two sureties, for the like sum each.
ii. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned SHO between 09.00 a.m and 5.00 p.m., on every Monday for a period of eight (8) weeks, for the purpose of investigation or till filing of charge sheet whichever is earlier and thereafter, as and when required.
iii. The petitioners shall abide by the other conditions stipulated in Section 482 (2) of BNSS and cooperate with the Investigating Officer in investigating the case.
7.
Accordingly, these Criminal Petitions are allowed. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.
_______________ K. SUJANA, J Date: 02.03.2026 PN
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.2450 and 2466 OF 2026 Date: 02.03.2026 PN