← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCC(TR)/315/2017closed no costs

Darshanala Rajam, Adilabad Dist. v. Sri Vikas Raj, Ias, Hyd And 4 Othrs

2018-08-10P Naveen Rao2 pages

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO CONTEMPT CASE (TR) No.315 OF 2017 DATED :10.08.2018 Between :

Darshanala Rajam S/o.Ushalu, Aged about 45 yrs, Occu : Watcher daily wage, O/o.The Divisional Forest Officer, Wildlife Management Division, Jannaram-504 205 (Now named as O/o.The Deputy Director, Kawal Tiger Reserve, Jannaram), R/o.H.No.4-337, Gandhi Nagar, Ponkal, Jannaram-504 205, Adilabad Dist.

..

Petitioner And Sri Vikas Raj, I.A.S, The Government of Telangana, Rep., by its Principal Secretary to Govt.

Environment, Forests Science & Technology Department, Telangana Secretariat, Hyderabad 500 022 & others. .. Respondents This court made the following :

- 2 - THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO CONTEMPT CASE (TR) No.315 OF 2017 ORDER :

C.A.No.68 of 2016 is filed before the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short 'the Tribunal') alleging violation of the orders of the Tribunal passed in O.A.No.9198 of 2013, wherein the Tribunal directed consideration of the claim of the petitioner for regularization, by observing that that the applicant worked from 1984 to 1997 and that the posts are available as per G.O.Ms.No.88 dated 19.07.2000 and directed consideration of the claim of the applicant in the existing vacancies.

2.

According to learned Government Pleader, by proceedings dated 26.04.2016 the issue was considered and held that petitioner was not continuously working and that there are no vacancies available; that petitioner is engaged as and when his work is required; his services were not regularized and his claim was rejected.

3.

Thus it cannot be said that there is violation of the directions issued by the Tribunal much less deliberate and willful warranting initiation of contempt proceedings.

4.

Contempt case is accordingly closed granting liberty to the petitioner to avail appropriate remedies against the decision rejecting the request of petitioner for regularization. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J 10th August, 2018 Rds