Kaithepalli Durga Rao, v. The State Of A.P., Rep. By Its Principal Secretary,
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI O R D E R:
This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for the following relief:
"Issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the Respondents in opening the rowdy sheet No 92/ 2013 of 3rd Respondent Police station as illegal, arbitrary and violative of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and also none of the clause of Standing Order 601 of AP Police Manual were not satisfied as such the proceedings launched against the petitioner is un constitutional and the same may be quashed and consequently direct the respondents to remove the petitioner name vide No 92/2013 from the Rowdy Sheet Register maintained by the respondents."
2. When the matter is called, it is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner herein may be permitted to file an application before the appropriate authority under the A.P. Police Standing Orders requesting for closure of the rowdy sheet.
3. Recording the said submission, writ petition is disposed of, keeping it open for the petitioner herein to submit application before the competent authority under the A.P. Police Standing Orders requesting for closure of rowdy sheet, and if such application is made by the petitioner herein, the same shall be considered in accordance with law. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, shall stand disposed of. No order as to costs.
______________ A.V.SESHA SAI, J Date: 12.08.2015 grk THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
Dated 12th August, 2015 grk THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
Date: 12th August, 2015 Between:
Kaithepalli Durga Rao, s/o Raghavlulu, Hindu, aged about 35 years, R/o Pedapalem village, Nagayalanka Mandal, Krishna District. ...Petitioner and The State of A.P., represented by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and three others.
... Respondents DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 12th August, 2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL: 12th August, 2015 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
1. Whether Reporters of Local Newspapers May be allowed to see the Judgment? Yes/No
2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Marked to Law Reporters/Journals? Yes/No
3. Whether Their Lordship wish to see the Fair copy of the judgment? Yes/No