Goddanti Venkateshwara Rao v. Jampa Rama Raghava

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.531 OF 2017 ORAL ORDER:

Heard Sri T. Koteshwara Prasad, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, and perused the material on record.

2. The learned counsel would admit that in the affidavit filed in support of the application for referring the promissory note to the handwriting expert, the petitioner did not state as to on what aspect the handwriting expert's opinion is required. However, the learned counsel would submit that a chance may be afforded to move an appropriate application to seek opinion of the handwriting expert in relation to whether there has been any alteration in the date or to determine the age of the ink in mentioning the date on the promissory note.

3. Permission is accorded to withdraw the present revision petition with liberty as requested.

4. With the above direction, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

ASN,J C.R.P. No.531 OF 2017 As a sequel thereto, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the present revision petition stand dismissed as withdrawn. ___________________________ A. SHANKAR NARAYANA, J April 17, 2018.

PV