Dheeravath. Manya Naik v. State Of Telengana
./
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE :PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G SRI DEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2273, 2439 and 2476 OF 2021 CRLP NO. 2273 0F 2021:
Between:
Dheeravath Ravi Naik, S/o Saida Petitioner/Accuse d No.14 AND The State ofTelangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.14 herein on Anticipatory Bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.187/2017, of the PS Miryalaguda Rural, Nalgonda District, for the offences Under Sec. 120(b), 420, 201, 202, 203, R/W 149 IPC The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing ths arguments of V RAGHUNATH Advocate for the Petitioner, and THE ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent CRLP NO. 2439 0F 2021:
Between:
Dheeravath. Manya Naik, S/o Janaya Naik Petitioner/Accused - l3 AND State ofTelengana, represented through Public Prosecutor at High Court, Telengana (Miryalaguda(R) Police) Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased toto order to enlarge the petitioners on bail, in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No. Cr.No. 187/2017, dated 22/061201'1 on the file of Mirayalaguda(R) PS Q.Jalgonda District), in the interests ofjustice The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of SRI VIJAYA LAKSHMI KONDRAMUTLA Advocate for the Petitioner, and THE ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent.
._-
CRLP NO. 2416 0F 2021:
Between:
Banavath Babu Rao Naik, S/o. Pachya Naik Petitioneri Accused No. I I AND The State ofTelangana, Rep by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Hyderabad. Respondent/Complainant Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge the Petitioner/Accused No.1 I herein on Anticipatory Bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.1 87/2017 , of the PS Miryalaguda Rural, Nalgonda District, for the offences Under Sec. \20(b),420,201,202,203, zuW 149 IPC The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of V RAGHUNATH Advocate for the Petitioner, and THE ASST PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent and the Court made the following.
ORDER
t
/ THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CRL.P.N os.227 3, 2439 and 247 6 of 2021 COMMON ORDER:
A11 these Criminal Petitions, under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1,973, ate filed by the petitioners seeking to grant anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No.1B7 of 2A17 of Miryalaguda Rural Pollce Station, Nalgonda District, which was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120 (b), 420,20L,202 and 203 read with Section 149 of I.P.C.
Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners; learned Assistant Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent-State and perused the record.
tr-earned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and they are nothing to do with the alleged offence. He also submits that the petitioners do not have any criminal antecedents and that the petitioners are ready to abide by any condition that may be imposed in the event of their enlargement on anticipatory bail.
Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners Looking into the nature of allegations leveled against the petitioners; having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case
and in view of the peculiar conditions of pandemic COVID-19 prevailing in the Country, without delving into the rnerits of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners herein.
Accordingly, all the Criminal Petitions are allowed and the petitioners herein are granted anticipatory bail on the following terms and conditions:
(i) The petitioners are directed to surrender before the Station House Officer, Miryalaguda Rural Police Station, Nalgonda District, within a period of fifteen days from today, and on such surrender, they shall be released on bail on their executing personal bond to the tune of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty thousand only) each with tn'o sureties each to the like amount to his satisfaction.
(ii) The petitioners sha1l also comply with the other conditions as iaid down under Section a38 Q) of Cr.P.C.
_]- sD/- r.
ASSIST NAGA LAKSHMI REGIST //TRUE COPY/I SECTION Orhlcnn To, . The Judicial First Class Magistrate at Miryalaguda -- . The Station House OfIicer, pS Miryataguda Ru-rat, Nalgonda District . One CC to SRI. V RAGHLTNATH Advocate IOPUCI _Two CC's to Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad (OUT) ., One spare copy a 5.
Avs
HIGI{ COURT GSDJ i DLTED:13/05/2021 la oR gClA/- THE S I 9 r( EI o 1 3 ua,r zflzt z j t * TC,H
ORDER
CRLP.No.2273, 2439 AND 2476 of 2021 i BAIL