Y.Sangeetha Rani v. C.Ramchander
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD
FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH * * * * F.C.A.No.183 of 2014 Between:
Y. Sangeetha Rani .. Appellant and C. Ramchander .. Respondent DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: July 16, 2015 SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers Yes/No may be allowed to see the Judgments?
2. Whether the copies of judgment may be Yes/No marked to Law Reporters/Journals?
3. Whether their Ladyship/Lordship wish to Yes/No see the fair copy of the Judgment?
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
F.C.A.No.183 OF 2014 AND F.C.A.MP.No.290 OF 2015 JUDGMENT: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice R. Subhash Reddy) The appeal, under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act, 1984, is filed aggrieved by the order and decree, dated 28.03.2014, passed in O.P.No.588 of 2011 by the Additional Family Court, Hyderabad.
The appellant filed the aforesaid O.P., under Section 13 (1) (ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, seeking dissolution of marriage performed between herself and the respondent by way of decree of divorce. The Family Court, by impugned order, dated 28.03.2014, dismissed the O.P., against which, the present appeal is filed. During pendency of the appeal, the parties have filed F.C.A.MP.No.290 of 2015, under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 C.P.C., to dispose of the appeal in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise, which is annexed to the petition, and to dissolve the marriage performed between the parties by granting decree of divorce.
In the affidavits filed in support of the petition, it is stated that at the intervention of elders, the dispute between the parties is resolved amicably and a Memorandum of Compromise, signed by the parties and
their respective counsel, is entered into between the parties.
When the matter is called, the parties, who are present in person and who have been identified by their respective counsel, have requested to dispose of the appeal in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise annexed to the petition.
In view of the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in support of F.C.A.MP.No.290 of 2015, the petition is allowed as prayed for. Consequently, the appeal is allowed by setting aside the impugned order, dated 28.03.2014, and by dissolving the marriage of the appellant with the respondent in terms of the Memorandum of Compromise. The Memorandum of Compromise shall form part of the decree.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed. No costs.
______________________ R. SUBHASH REDDY, J ___________________________ A. SHANKAR NARAYANA, J July 16, 2015 MD