Dr. Ananda Reddy, Karimnagar District v. Public Prosecutor, High Court Of A.P., Hyderabad And 6 Others
t 32ee I HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY ,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V. VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO: 3504 OF 2014 Between:
Dr. Ananda Reddy, Karimnagar District, S/o. Narasimha Reddy, Aged about 47 years, Occ: Practicing Doctor, Amrutha Nursing Home, Vemulawada, Karimnagar District.
...PETITIONER AND
1. The State of A.P., rep by Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.
2. The Director General of Police State of A.P., Hyderabad.
3. The Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad at Gachibowli, Hyderabad.
4. The Dy. Commissioner of Police, Cyberabad at Gachibowli, Hyderabad.
5. ,The Station House Officer, Madhapur Police Station,.Ranga Reddy District.
6. rCh.V. Radha Krishna, S/o. Ch.V. Subba Rao, Aged aboiuf43 year, Occ: Business, R:/o, Flat No.103, Dhanunjaya Residency, Plot No.150 & 151, Eenadu Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-72.
7. Y. Kesava Rao, S/o. not known C/o. Ch.V. Radha Krishna, R/o, Flat No.'103, Dhanunjaya Residency, Plot No.150 85151, Eenadu Colony, Kukatpally, Hyderabad-72.
...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order more particularly one in nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the acts of State and its authorities in registration of FIR No. 531/2013 on the false and frivolous complaint of Ch. V. Radha Krishna is illegal, arbitrary, unlawful and quash the same LA. NO: 1OF 2O14(WPMP. NO: 4302OF 20141 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in FIR No. 531 of 2013 including the attendance of the petitioner in the said CC on the file of the lX MM Court, Cyberabad, Kukatpally pending disposal of the Wiit Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. C. HANUMANTHA RAO Counsel forthe Respondent Nos. 1 to 5: GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 6&7: None Appeared The Court made the following: OROER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION No.35O4 of 2OL4 ORDER:
The present writ petition is filed seeking to issue a writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring that the acts of State its authorities 1n registration of FIR. No. 53 1 of 20 1 3 on the false and frivolous compliant of Ch.V.Radha Krishana i.e., respondent No.6 is i1lega1, arbitrary, unlauful. 2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, fairly submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Therefore, no further orders are required and hence seeks to dismiss the same as infructuous
3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader representing learned Special Government Pleader for Home takes no objection to the same 4.
In view of the above submissions, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs .// "-4
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall also stand closed.
SD/- P.Ch. NAGABHUSHAMBA ASSISTANT REGIS //TRUE COPY// SECTIO OFFICER To, '1. Two CCsto GP FOR HOME,High Courtforthe State of Telangana, at Hyderabad [OUT]
2. One CC to sRl. C. HANUMANTHA RAO, Advocate [oPUC]
3. Two CD Copies B [Vl r,.
cJPrf\,\---
HIGH COURT DATED:3010612023 \r o ,( a),j 1q [uB NN
ORDER
t :'<' l WP.No.3504 of 2014 DISMISS!NG THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS 9\ 3q o ok\ L3