Maganti Seetharamaiah, v. State Of Andhra Pradesh,

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT W.P. No.6723 OF 2010 ORDER:

Counsel appearing for the parties state that the writ prayer is covered against the petitioner in the decision of K.Satyananda Patnaik v.

Hyderabad Urban Development Authority, the Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority, Hyderabad 1. The statement is placed on record and the writ petition is dismissed accordingly. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending if any shall stand closed. ___________ S.V.BHATT, J Date: 29.08.2017 Stp 1 2016 (3) ALD 600 (DB)