K.V. Rami Reddy v. State Of Telangana
133831 HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY WRIT PETITION (TR) NO: 2291 OF 2o1f Between:
K.V. RAMI REDDY, S/o. K.Venkata Reddy, Aged about 34 years, HC.102, Vlllth Battalion, TSSP, Kondapur, Ranga Reddy District. ...PETITIONER AND State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad-500 022.
The Additional Director General of Police, T.S.S.P. Battalions, Hyderabad.
3. The Commandant, Vlllth Battalion, T.S.S.P Baftalions, Kondapur, Ranga Reddy District.
4. B.Balu, S/o B.Mansingh, age about 37 years, Occ Head Constable (MT Group) in Vlll Battalion, T.S.S. P.Kondapur, Ranga Reddy District.
5. G.Pitchasiah, S/o Ramanna, age about 41 years, Occ Head Constable (MT Group) in Vlll Battalion, T.S.S. P.Kondapur, Ranga Reddy District.
6. G.Dasharatha, S/o Kashaiah, age about 40 years, Occ Head Constable (MT Group) in Vlll Battalion, T.S.S. P.Kondapur, Ranga Reddy District.
7. Ayub Khan, S/o Uomrdreez Khan, age about 44 years, Occ Head Constable (MT Group) in Vlll Battalion, T.S.S.P.Kondapur, Ranga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constrtution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to call for the records pertaining to proceedings Rc.No.A1l728l2010-15, DO.No.999/2014 dated-1 1.06.2014 of the 3rd respondent in reverting the applicant from the post of Head Constable to Police Constable and set aside the same as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the rules and against the principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to continue the applicant as Head Constable, Vlllth Battalion, T.S.S.P, Kondapur, Ranga Reddy District.
lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to expedite hearing of the Writ Petition.
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI M.V.PRATAP REDDY Counsel for the Respondent No.1 to 3: SRI M.V.RAMA RAO, SPL. GP FOR HOME Counsel for the Respondent No.4 to 7: SRI M.VENKAT RAM REDDY The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA AIISHETTY WRIT PETITION TRI NO.229t OF 2017 ORDER:
Today when the matter has been taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that subsequent to the filling of the Writ Petition(TR), the petitioner was promoted to the post of Head Constable and in view of the same the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication. 2.
Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stancl closed. No order as to costs.
SD/- K VENKAIAH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPYII SECTIO FFICER To, One.CC to SRI M.V.PRATAP REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] One CC to SRI M.VENKAT RAM REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to SRI M.V.RAMA RAO, SPL GP FOR HOME, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] Two CD Copies J BSR GJP *\.r
HIGH COURT DATED: 0711112023 ( rtiE STA 16'
t )l
ORDER
v a 2 I N0u 2023 Lio.
t'*\.1 ^ -\{:::l:
WP(TR).N o.2291 ot 2O17 -r! .1 ti''/'
r,(o DrsMrssrNc THE WRIT PETTflON (TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS, WITHOUT COSTS N,3 ${<