Nagarapu Bhagya Laxmi v. The State Of Telangana,

,1 I 325s 1

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WBIT PETITION (TR) NO: 427s oF 2017 Between:

NAGARAPU BHAGYA LAXMI, Wo Y.Janardhan, Asst.(English) Z.P.H.S.RavaJkoJe, Medchal Mandal, Aged 37 years, School R R.District.

...PETITIONER AND The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, School Education department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. The Director of School Education, State of Telangana, Hyderabad. The District Educational Offrcer, Ranga Reddy District. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 ol the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to declare the action of the respondents ln not awarding Ten ('!0) points for effecting transfer on the ground that the applicant husband is working in the other district ln accordance with Rules issued in GO Ms. No. 12, (School Education (Ser.ll) Department) dated 't6.06.2015 is illegal arbitrary and discriminatory, unconstitutional consequently hold that the applicant is entitled for awarding Ten (10) Points under Special categories (spouse category) ln the ensuing transfer Counseling to be held on 1O.7.2015 for the purpose transfer with all consequential benefits.

/ l.A. NO: I OF 2017(WVMP(TR). NO: 874 OF 2017) Between:

'l. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary, School Education department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.

2. The Director of School Education, State of Telangana, Hyderabad.

3. The District Educational Officer, Ranga Reddy District.

4. The District Collector, Ranga Reddy District. ...APPLICANT AND NAGARAPU BHAGYA LAXMI, W/o Y.Janardhan, Aged 37 years, School Asst.(English) Z. P H.S. RavaJkoJe, Medctal Mandal,R R. District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated. 09.07.20't5 in OA.No. 375912015. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI C. SAI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION The Court made the following: ORDER l

HONOURABLE SRI IUSTICE N.V.SHRAVAN KUMAR WRITPETITION ffR) No.4275 OF 2017 ORDER:

Today when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the matter has become infructuous with the efflux of time and no further orders are required in the Writ Petition(TR).

2.

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Writ Petition (TR) is dismissed as infructuous. 3.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. No order as to cost.

SD/.N.CHANDRA SEKHAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR v--- SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, l One CC to SRI C. SAI REDDY, Advocate IOPUp]. - i. iii. Ed.i"-cFiion sc-ffoi 'EoirAirbru, Hijh court tor the state of Telangana. [OUT] Two CD CoPies BN SW BN

HIGH COURT DATED:2411112022

ORDER

WP(TR).No.4275 of 2017 TAr4, t \\ .:Y )) () -t 1$ J[tl 2[8 1'

.n-- ',I.t --*;t:i.:;,r , i t :

DrsMrssrNG THE WRIT PET|TION (TR) AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS 6 CoTr-t bN/el,l*,o