← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/3926/2011allowed no costs

Bapatla Srinivasa Rao, And 2 Others, v. The State Of Ap Rep By Its Pp Hyd., And Another,

2018-01-021 pages

SMT JUSTI CE T. RAJANI CRI MI NAL PETI TI ON No.3 9 2 6 of 2 0 1 1 ORDER:

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 13.12.2017, as none appeared, it was directed to be listed under the caption 'for dismissal' on 26.12.2017 and thereafter, at request, the matter was underwent two adjournments. Even today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, neither the petitioners appear nor there is any representation on their behalf. Hence, the petition is taken up for disposal on merits. 2.

This petition is filed seeking for quash of the proceedings against the petitioners, who are accused Nos.1 to 3, in Crime No.82 of 2011 on the file of Bapatla Town Police Station, Bapatla. The offences alleged are under Sections 109, 420, 366, 354 r/ w 34 IPC.

3.

During the course of hearing, the Public Prosecutor reports that the case was referred as false on 31.07.2014 by virtue of the proceedings of SDPO, Bapatla, vide Lr.C.No.133/ SDPO/ BPL/ Ref/ 2011.

4.

In view of the submissions made by the Public Prosecutor that the case was referred as false, this court is of the view that no further orders need be passed and this petition has become infructuous.

5.

This Criminal Petition is, accordingly, dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ T. RAJANI , J January 2, 2018/ LMV