Mohd. Khaja Pasha v. The State Of Telangana

HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.328 of 2019 ORDER :

Heard before admission and before notice to respondent Nos.2 to 6 of whom respondent Nos.3 to 6, being minors, are represented by respondent No.2 being their mother and perused the impugned docket order, dated 18.03.2019, of the trial Court.

The trial Court issued non-bailable warrant for non-payment of the balance of the final maintenance. In fact, there is nothing to interfere with the order of the trial Court, much less to admit the revision or pending admission issue notice and keep it pending, but for to dispose of, for no grounds to interfere other than to grant time till 06.05.2019 to pay the entire arrears. Failing which, for all purposes, without any further reference to the Court, it can be treated that there is no direction by this Court in disposing of the present revision, but for to say, it is expecting compliance. The trial Court shall not enforce the order in the meantime.

With the above direction, the revision is disposed of. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________ Dr. B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J 28th March 2019 Note:

Issue C.C. by tomorrow.

(b/o) mar

Dr.SSRB, J Crl.R.C.No.2267 of 2014 Heard before admission and before notice to respondent Nos.2 to 6 of whom others represented by R.2, mother being minors and perused the impugned docket order of the Court, it is for non-payment of the balance of the final maintenance, warrant issued. In fact, there is nothing to interfere with the order of the lower Court, much less to admit the revision or pending admission issue notice and keep it pending, but for to dispose of for no grounds to interfere other than to grant time one month to pay the entire arrears on or before 6/5.2019.... Failing which, for all purposes without any further reference to the Court it can be treated that there is no above direction by this Court in disposing of the present revision, but for to say it is expecting the compliance, the lower Court shall not enforce the order meantime.