Shaik Mastan, v. P. Krishna Kumar Goud,

HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CI VI L REVI SI ON PETI TI ON No.3 1 3 5 of 2 0 1 1 ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of CPC is filed challenging the Order dt. 03.11.2010 in CMA No.545 of 2009 passed by I Additional District Judge, Rangareddy District at L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad.

Sri Venkata Raghu Ramulu, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri K. Sameer Kumar, learned counsel for Respondent No.1, represented that the Decree in O.S.No.2412 of 2005 was executed in EP No.861 of 2006 and accordingly, possession of the property was delivered in pursuance of the Decree and delivery was also recorded and therefore, there is nothing to be adjudicated by this Court in the present Revision.

Recording the said submission, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. However, leaving it open to the petitioners to redress their claim in an appropriate Court. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this case, shall stand dismissed.

____________________________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J Date: 16-06-2017.

eha

HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CRP No.3 1 3 5 of 2 0 1 1 Dt. 16-06-2017 eha