Polamoni Jangaiahgolla , Jangaiah v. The State Of Telangana,
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE THIRD DAY OF IVARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.VIJAYSEN REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 6600 OF 2019 Between:
Polamoni JangaiahGolla @ Jangaiah, s/o Rajaiah, aged 50 yrs, Occ- Agriculture, r/o Satamrai Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy Distrtict.
...PETITIONER AND '1 . The State of Telangana, Revenue Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad, rep. by its Principal Secretary
2. The Joint Collector, Ranga Reddy District, Lakdikapool, Hyderabad
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Chevella Revenue Division, Ranga Reddy District.
4. The Tahsitdar,, Shamshabad Mandal, Shamshabad, Ranga Reddy District.
5. Vinod Purushotham Bai Patel, s/o Late Purushotham Bai Patel, aged about 45 yrs, r/o Satham Rai village, Shamshabad lt4andal, R.R.District. (also the r/o'l08,Beaver Road, Ashford, Kent, United Kingdom) ,..RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Cou( may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order, or Direction, more particularly one in nature of Writ of IUANDAIVUS to set aside the orders dt.11-06-2015 passed in Case no.D1137712011 after declaring the said orders passed by the 2nd respondent dismissing the no.D1/37712011 as withdrawn allegedly on the basis of a memo which was not filed by the petitioner, is the result of fraud played on the petitioner by the respondent No.5 and consequently to direct the 2nd respondent to restore the appeal on to the file of the 2nd respondent to facilitate disposal of the same on merits, after affording opportunity to the parties to the appeal, in the lnterest of Justice.
lA NO: I OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the respondent No.2 to produce the memo on the basis of which the orders were passed dismissing the no.D1137712011 as withdrawn, in the interest of Justice, Pending Disposal of the Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B. SUDHAKAR REDDY AND NEERAJA REDDY Counsel forthe Respondent Nos.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondent No.5:---- The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. VIJAYSEN REDDY W.P.No.660O OF 20 19 ORDER:
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner had contended that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication and has become infructuous.
Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/.T.JAYASREE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ,TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, One CC to Sri B. Sudhakar Reddy and Neeraja Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT] Two CD Copies One Spare Copy Sm BS
HIGH COURT DATED:A310312022 ni
ORDER
WP.No.6600 of 2019 DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS '47r, I lo'q4 l/-/, !,/0 tr- //