Mr. N. Nagendra Rao v. The State Of Telangana

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

MONDAY, THE TWENT]ETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE / :PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER IA No, 1OF 2O21 IN CRLP NO; 2559 OF 2021 Between:

Mr, N. Nagendra Rao, S/o N. Naganna Petitioner/Accu sed No. 6 (Petitioner in CRLP 2559 OF 202t on the file of High Court) AND The State of Telangana, Represented by Public Prosecutor Through, Police Bollaram, Sa nga reddy District Respond ent/Co m pla ina nt ( Respondents in-do-) Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the time granted by court in CrlP.No. 2559 0f 27.05.2021 for surrender before the SHO, Bollaram, in the interest of justice, Pending disposal of CRLP No. 2559 of 2021, on the file of the High Cou rt.

CRLP NO: 2559 OF 2021 Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Couft may be pleased to grant Anticipatory Bail to Petitioners/ Accused No. 6 directing the police to release the petitio ne rslAccu sed No. 6 in the event of his arrest in Crime No. 115 of 2020 at Police Boilaram, Sangareddy District The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the grounds filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court dated 27.O5.2027 made in Crl.P, and upon hearing the arguments of Sri I Gopal Reddy Advocate for the Petitioner and of Public Prosecutor for the Respondent, the Court made the following

ORDER

This application is filed by the petitioner/A6 seeking to extend the time granted to him to surrender before the Station House Officer concerned, vide order, dated 27.O5,2O2Lt passed by this Court in Crl.P.No. 2559 ol 2.021, Heard both sides. Perused the record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner/A6 would submit that the petitioner/A6 could not contact his earlier counsel on record. The petitioner/A6 was not informed by his earlier counsel on record about the grant of bail, in spite of the petitioner/A6 approaching the counsel and calling him several times and ultimately, prayed to extend the time granted to the petitioner/A6 to surrender before the Station House Office concerned.

The contentions put forth before this Court by the learned counsel for the petitioner/A6 are flimsy and not genuine, except blaming the earlier counsel on record, Under these circumstances, it is not a fit case to extend the time as sought for.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

SD/- K.

l I t //TRUE COPY// SECTION O FFICER To, The Judicial First Class Magistrate at Narsapur, Sanga Reddy District The Station House Officer, Bollaram Police Station, Sangareddy District One CC to Sri I Gopal Reddy Advocate IOPUC] Two CC to Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad (OUT) One spa re copy (-

I HIGH COURT DR.SA] DATED:20l 09 / 2o2L i4 TE 6f .$ s \, * o.

() o \

ORDER

* H5lll IA No.1 of 2O2L in CRLP.No.2559 of 2O21 DIRECTION