M/S. Transstroy (India) Limited, v. The State Of Telangana

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT WRIT PETITION No.10629 of 2015 Date: April 22, 2015 Between:

M/s. Transstroy (India) Limited, Represented by its Deputy General Manager M. Kameswara Rao. ... Petitioner And

1. The State of Telangana, Department of Revenue, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Hyderabad & 3 others. ... Respondents * * * HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT WRIT PETITION No.10629 of 2015 O R D E R:

The writ petition was listed for admission on 15.04.2015. At request of learned standing counsel writ petition stood over to today.

2. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner places before the Court the notice of award under Section 37 (2) of Act 30 of 2013 dated 31.03.2015. The learned counsel submits that the notice bristles with so many illegalities, irregularities. As a subsequent development has arisen during the pendency of the writ petition, he requests the Court to permit him to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to assail the acquisition proceedings against the subject premises by filing a comprehensive writ petition.

3. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn by granting the leave as stated above.

4. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand dismissed in consequence. No order as to costs.

___________ S.V. BHATT, J Date: April 22, 2015.

BSB HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V. BHATT

WRIT PETITION No.10629 of 2015

Date: April 22, 2015 BSB