Modern High School,Nizamabad Dist v. Prl.Scy,S.E,Hyd,And 4

[3168 ] HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY .THE THIRD DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.LAKSHMAN WRIT PETITION NO:3447 OF 2013 Between:

Modern High School,(Regd.No.

1 6 of 1962) Khaleelwadi, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. Rep. by its Secretary Mr. It/. Simhachalam. ...PETITIONER AND

1. The Principal Secretary, School Education, Secretariat, Hyderabad2. The Commissioner and Director of School Education, Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh.

3. The Regional Joint Director, School Education, Hyderabad.

4. The District Educational Officer, Nizamabad District, Nizamabad.

5. The Deputy Educational Officer, Nizamabad, Nizamabad District. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.4 in issuing the Proceedings in Rc.No.6646lA3/2012 dated 30.01.2013 as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, unreasonable and against the principles of the natural justice and consequently to set aside the same, LA. NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP. NO: 4279 OF 20131 Petition under Sectlon 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in Rc.No.66461A312012 dated 30.01.2013 issued by the respondent No.4 during pendency of the Writ Petition, Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI Y. NEELAKANTA REDDY FOR SRI. G MADHUSUDHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER:

HO\OU It..\ Ll. L S ItI IUSTICE K.LAKSHNIA...\I \\ RI I I'li.l'l tlON No. 3M7 Ot' 2073 ot(DEt( Today, when the matter was listed, Sri Y.Neelakanta Reddy representing Sri G,Madhusudhan Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission from this Court to withdraw this writ petition.

2.

Permission is accorded to withdraw the writ petition. 3.

Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. SdA I. NA(;A LAKSHI\,II I)EPUTY REGISTRAR '- il 1 //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,

1. One CC to SRl. G MADHUSUDHAN REDDY Advocate [OPUC]

2. Two CCs to GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION ,High Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT]

3. Two CD Copies \-r- 'x-

HIGH COURT pJ DATED:0310812022 .T:

c, "..s1: t:

"!

a f drt

ORDER

l I WP.No.3447 o12013 WRIT PETITION IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS >o 1v