M. Rama Krishna, v. Dandu Vijaya Lakshmi Devi

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA : HYDERABAD MAIN CASE No: W.A.No.393 of 2024 PROCEEDING SHEET S.

No.

DATE

ORDER

OFFICE NOTE 02.

11.06.2024 CJ & JAK, J I.A.No.1 of 2024 Mr. Surya Balu Mahendra, learned counsel for the appellant.

Mr. A.Narasimha Rao, learned counsel for respondent No.1.

Heard on I.A.No.1 of 2024.

For the reasons assigned in I.A.No.1 of 2024, leave is granted.

In the result, I.A.No.1 of 2024 is allowed.

_____________ CJ (AAJ) _____________ JAK, J I.A.No.4 of 2024 Mr. Surya Balu Mahendra, learned counsel for the appellant.

Mr. A.Narasimha Rao, learned counsel for respondent No.1.

Heard on I.A.No.4 of 2024.

For the reasons assigned in the application, requirement of filing the certified copy of the order dated 11.01.2023 passed in W.P.No.40406 of is

dispensed with.

In the result, the aforesaid interlocutory application is allowed.

_____________ CJ (AAJ) _____________ JAK, J I.A.No.2 of 2024 Mr. Surya Balu Mahendra, learned counsel for the appellant.

Mr. A.Narasimha Rao, learned counsel for respondent No.1.

Heard on I.A.No.2 of 2024.

For the reasons assigned in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, we find that sufficient cause on condonation of delay of 391 days in filing the appeal is made out.

In the result, delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the interlocutory application is allowed.

_____________ CJ (AAJ) _____________ JAK, J WRIT APPEAL No.393 of 2024 Writ Appeal is disposed of.

(Vide Separate Judgment) (B/o.) KL