M. Rama Krishna v. B.Narayana Murthy

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA MAIN CASE No: Writ Appeal No.418 of 2024 PROCEEDING SHEET S.

No.

DATE

ORDER

OFFICE NOTE 1.

04.06.2024 CJ & JAK, J Note:

Transferred to (i/o) folder before corrections, if any.

B/o lur I.A.No.1 of 2024 Mr. Surya Balu Mahendra, learned counsel for the appellant.

Mr. M.A.K.Mukheed, learned counsel for respondent No.1.

Mr.

Muralidhar Reddy Katra, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appears for respondents No.2 to 5.

Heard on I.A.No.1 of 2024.

For the reasons assigned in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, leave for filing this appeal is granted.

In the result, the aforesaid Interlocutory Application is allowed.

I.A.No.2 of 2024 Mr. Surya Balu Mahendra, learned counsel for the appellant.

Mr. M.A.K.Mukheed, learned counsel for respondent No.1.

Mr.

Muralidhar Reddy Katra, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appears for respondents No.2 to 5.

Heard on I.A.No.2 of 2024.

For the reasons assigned in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, delay of 395 days in filing the appeal is condoned.

In the result, the aforesaid Interlocutory Application is allowed.

I.A.No.3 of 2024 Mr. Surya Balu Mahendra, learned counsel for the appellant.

Mr. M.A.K.Mukheed, learned counsel for respondent No.1.

Mr.

Muralidhar Reddy Katra, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appears for respondents No.2 to 5.

Heard on I.A.No.3 of 2024.

For the reasons assigned in the application, duly supported by an affidavit, requirement of filing the certified copy of the impugned order is dispensed with.

In the result, the aforesaid Interlocutory Application is allowed.

_________ CJ (AAJ) _________ JAK, J CJ & JAK, J WA is disposed of.

(vide separate judgment) B/o Lur

LUR/RRB