Somnath Chetty v. The State Of Telangana
[ 3166 ]
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO: 6837 OF 2023 Between:
Somnath Chetty, S/o Late Madavalappa Aged about 50 years, Occ- Business R/o 5-3-862/1, Malakunta, Nampally, Hyderabad ...'ETITIONER AND
1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Municipal Administration And Urban Development Secretariat, Hyderabad
2. Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC), Tank, Bund, Hyderabad Rep. by its Commissioner
3. The Special Deputy Commissioner Land Acquisition Officer, GHMC 6th Floor, Municipal Complex, Tank Bund Road Hyderabad ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndia praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS directing the Respondents to deposit decreetal amount to the credit of LAOP No.65 ol 2016 on the file of I Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad in pursuance of order and decree dated 22.6.202O.
lA NO: 1 OF 2023 tt Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to deposit the decreetal amount in terms of order and decree passed in LAOP No.65 of 2O16 dated 221612020 on the file of the I Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad forthwith. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI YOGESH KUMAR HEROOR Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT Counsel for the Respondent No.2 & 3: SRt K.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T. VINOD KUMAR W.P. No.6837 of 2023
ORDER
Counsel for petitioner submits that subsequent to the filing of the Writ Petition, the respondents have deposited part of the EP claim before the Court below, ernd he therefore seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to hlc a fresh Writ Petition. in the event of the Court 5916\ r passing an order on the differential EP claim amount.
2.
Sri K.Ravinder Reddy, learned Standing Clounsel appearing for respondents No.2 & 3 submits that he has no objection for the same.
3.
Granting liberty as sought for, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs 4 .
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pend ing, if any, shall stand closed.
SD/- MOHD. SANAULLAH ANSARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR /ITRUE COPY// V SECTION OFFICER To, H KUMAR HEROOR, Advocate [OPUC] NDER REDDY, SC FOR GHMC [OPUC] UNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN Court for the State of Telangana. [OUT] I I tI i I
1. One CC to SRI YOGES
2. One CC to SRI K. RAVI
3. Two CCs to GP FOR M DEVELOPMENT, High
4. Two CD Copies BN GJP
f HIGH COURT DATED:3010112024 I i I i
ORDER
z -:-- ._'=\- \ 14 i:\ Y WP.No.6837 ot 2023 ?6 rtn nu c\) t?, a DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWN WITHOUT COSTS C-, "/ @ oqt* 60q-