← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaARBAPPL/59/2017allowed no costs

Mr.Mohd Bin Salam, Hyd v. Shaik Mohammed Saleem , Mahmoob, Hyd

2018-08-30Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan1 pages

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SRI THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN ARBITRATION APPLICATION No.59 OF 2017 ORDER:

This is an application for requisite measures under Section 11(2) and (6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act').

2.

Notice issued to the respondent was taken by Registered Post to the respondent and it had been returned unclaimed. Since the postal article has been taken to the last known address of the respondent and since the postal article has been returned unclaimed after notice of such postal article from the postal department, due service of notice on the respondent is declared. 3.

The agreement dated 29.1.2008 contains an arbitration clause. Accordingly, there are disputes between the parties. The notice issued by the applicant before institution of this arbitration application has also not been replied by the respondent. Hence, sufficient cause is shown for taking due measures under Subsections (2), (5) and (6) of Section 11 of the Act. This application is eligible to be allowed.

4.

In the result, the Arbitration Application is allowed appointing an Arbitrator.

5.

Sri Ch.K. Durga Rao, retired District Judge, is appointed as the Arbitrator to arbitrate on the disputes between the applicant and the respondents and the said arbitrator shall enter on reference and proceed with, as enjoined by the Act.

Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in the Arbitration Application, shall stand closed. No order as to costs. _________________________________________ THOTTATHIL B. RADHAKRISHNAN, CJ Date: 30.08.2018 pnb