Kyasaram Savithri, W/O. Kyasara Raghunadha, v. The Central Bank Of India,

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE B. SIVA SANKARA RAO WRIT PETITION No.9299 of 2016 ORDER: (per Hon'ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar) The prayer of the petitioner in this case is as under: "The Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or Director or an Order which particularly in the nature of WRIT of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent Bank in issuing the Tender /Auction sale notice published in the news paper dated 20-02-2016 auction to be held on 30-032016 for Land & Building admeasuring Sq yds 71.94 at H.No.5-2 situated at Laxmapur Village, Shameerpet belonging to Sri Kyasaram Raghunadha Chary (Guarantor) under Equitable mortgage to bank and bounded by North: House of Muthyalu, South: Road, East: Road and West: House of S.

Krishna Murthy, is illegal, arbitrary, violation of principles of Natural Justice and violation of Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of SARFAEST ACT and set aside the same and consequently direct the respondent Bank not to take the possession of the above mentioned property of the petitioner and pass such other order or orders which may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case." It is now represented by Sri Ch. Siva Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent bank, that the auction sale proposed to be held as per the impugned sale notice did not materialise for want of bidders.

In that view of the matter, as the grievance of the petitioner in this case was only with regard to the proposed sale to be held pursuant to the impugned sale notice, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for consideration on merits at this stage.

The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous leaving it open to the petitioner to pursue her remedies in accordance with law in relation to the proceedings initiated by the respondent bank under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, as and when fresh cause arises. All issues are left open.

Interim order dated 22.03.2016 shall stand vacated. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs.

____________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J _______________________________ Dr. B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J Date:24.06.2016 GJ