T. Madhu Prasanth v. The State Of Telangana

THE HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE G. RADHA RANI CRIMINAL PETITION No.2901 of 2024 ORDER:

This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner/A1 under Sections 437 and 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of bail in Crime No.112 of 2024 of Jubilee Hills Police Station, Hyderabad, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 417, 313 and 506 r/w 34 of IPC.

2.

The case of the prosecution, in brief, was that on 30.01.2024, at 13:00 hours, the de facto complainant, the victim woman, lodged a report before the police stating that she was a working woman and while working in the office, she got acquainted with her coworker (A1) and their friendship turned into love. She knew that A1 was married to one Shravanthi (A3) but A1 promised her that he would give divorce to his wife and would marry her again and she believed A1. Since February 2022, he used to take her to OYO room, Kondapur and there they used to have physical relationship. She became pregnant in the month of November, 2023 and informed A1 about her pregnancy. On 17.11.2023, A1 took her to

Sai Diagnostics, Shivam Road, Nallakunta, Hyderabad and by making a wrong entry of her name, got her checked with the doctor. The doctor confirmed that she was carrying two weeks pregnancy. A1 also took personal loan of Rs.1,00,000/- on her name at Bajaj Finance in the month of October, 2023 and paid EMIs for two months and later she was made to pay the EMI. The sister and wife of A1 i.e. A2 and A3 threatened her over phone to undergo abortion. On 26.12.2023, A1 gave a pill to her, due to which, she got bleeding and abortion. Basing on the said report, the above case was registered against A1 to A4 for the offences punishable under Sections 376(2)(n), 417, 313 and 506 r/w 34 of IPC. The petitioner/A1 was arrested on 07.02.2024. 3.

Heard the learned counsel for petitioner/A1 and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-State. 4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner/A1 submitted that the de facto complainant was having knowledge that the petitioner/A1 was a married person and she also attended the marriage. She voluntarily participated in sexual intercourse with the petitioner/A1. She foisted a false case against the petitioner/A1.

He further submitted that the de facto complainant filed an affidavit reporting no objection for granting bail to A1 to A4 stating that the matter was settled between them amicably outside the Court.

5.

The victim woman appeared before the Court and stated that there was no force or undue influence exercised against her and she voluntarily gave the affidavit. Her Aadhar card was verified by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor with regard to her identity and confirmed the same.

6.

Perused the record.

7.

Considering that it was a voluntary sexual intercourse between a man and a woman, who were both adults and knowing about the consequences, the victim woman entered into the relationship with A1 and as she voluntarily appeared before this Court and stating that the matter was compromised between them and she was not intending to proceed against the accused persons and reporting no objection for grant of bail to the petitioner/A1, it

is considered fit to enlarge the petitioner/A1 on bail with certain conditions.

8.

Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the petitioner/A1 shall be released on bail subject to the following conditions:

1) The petitioner/A1 shall execute a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned XVII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, Hyderabad.

2) The petitioner/A1 shall abide by the conditions stipulated under Section 437(3) of Cr.P.C.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ______________________ Dr. G. RADHA RANI, J Date: 18.03.2024 ssp