D. Hanumantha Rao v. The State Of Telangana

Date: 15.04.2019 Between:

D.Hanumantha Rao s/o. late D.Satya Narayana, Aged about 59 years, S-2, Mythali Nivas, Gopalnagar, Hanumanpet, Malkajgiri and another. ....Petitioners and The State of Telangana, rep.by its Prl.Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad and others.

..... Respondents The Court made the following:

ORDER:

Heard learned counsel for petitioners and learned Government Pleader for respondents.

2.

Petitioners alleged to have filed complaint on 08.03.2019, and alleging that in spite of giving complaint of cognizable offence, crime is not registered, this writ petition is filed. 3.

On elaborate consideration of the issue and having regard to the law laid down by the Supreme Court, this Court in W.P.No.38397 of 2018 and batch, dated 8.3.2019 held that petitioners have to avail statutorily engrafted remedies available to them on issue of non-registration of crime and cannot directly invoke the jurisdiction of this Court.

4.

Having regard to the view taken by this Court in W.P.No.38397 of 2018 and batch, dated 8.3.2019, this Writ Petition is also not maintainable and is accordingly dismissed. It is made clear that there is no opinion expressed on the content of complaint. Petitioner is at liberty to avail statutory remedy ventilating his grievances against delay in registration of crime. Pending miscellaneous petitions shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO Date: 15.04.2019 kkm

Date : 15.04.2019 kkm