← Library
High Court for State of TelanganaCRLP/2648/2021dismissed

Thalluri Venkateswarlu v. The State Of Telangana

2021-04-15G Sri Devi4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA

AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF APRIL rWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE G. SRI DEVI CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 2648 OF 2021 Between:

Thalluri Venkateswarlu, s/o. Pullaiah, Ag.ed about 39 years, occ' Farmer' ilo l,laOfrarim Vilalge, singareni lr'4andal' Khammam District' ... Petitione r/Accused No'2 AND TheStateofTelangana,representedbyitsPublicProsecutorHighCourtforthe State of Telangana, HYderabad.

... Res Pondent Petition under section 438 of Cr.P.C praying that in the circumstances stated in the l\,4emorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Station House Officer, Karepally Police Station, Khammam District to release the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Cr.No.34 of 2021 of Karepally Police Station, Khammam District. This Petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition and upon hearing the arguments of Sri C. Damodar Reddy, Advocate for the Petitioner and the Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the Respondent.

The Court made the following: ORDER

HONOURABLE.,USTICE G. SRI DEVI CRIMI NAL PETITION NO .264a OF 2021 ORDER:

This Criminal petition, under Section 43g of the Code of Criminal Procedure, l9Z3 (Cr.p.C.), is filed by the petitioner/A-2, for grant of anticipatory bail in Crime No.34 of 2O2l of P.S. Karepally, Khammam District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 324,506 r/w.109 of the Indian Penal Code.

Heard 'the learned counsel lor the petitioner/A- 2, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent-State and perused the record.

As seen from the remand report of accused No. 1, it is crystal clear that the present petitioner/A-2 at t}:,e instance of A-1 had gone to the house of LW8 and asked him as to why the deceased had met him, for which LWS told him about the conversation took place between him and the deceased. This information was furnished by the present petitioner/A-2 to A1 over phone and also asked LW8 to talk with A- 1 . Further, after talking with LWS, A-1 became very angry and thought that if he would kil1 the deceased, no one comes forward to stop him in selling his house. On thinking so, A- 1 directed the present petitioner/A-2 to observe the movements of the deceased with an intention to kill the deceased. On that, the present petitioner/A-2 sneaked around the house of LW1, found the presence of the deceased and accordingly informed

the same to A-1. LWs 9 & 10, who were doing their household works, have seen the present petitioner/A-2 in front of the house. However, they did not suspect him since he is also the same villager. After completion of lunch at about 2.20p.m., the deceased and LW1 while chit-chating with each other in front of the room of LWl, at that time, the present petitioner/A-2 signalled to A- 1 and informed the location of LW1 and thereafter, A-1 has committed the crime. Thus, looking into tl-re nature of allegations levelled against the petitioner and his involvement in commission of the crime by giving information to A- 1 to commit the crime, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on anticipatory bail and accordingly his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the Court concerned within a period of fifteen (15) days from today and on such surrender and on filing an application for regular bail, the Court concerned shall consider the same in accordance with law.

Miscellaneous applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Petition, shall stand closed SD/-K.VENKAIAH ,TRUE COPY// ASSISTANT REGISTRAR l)t, SECTION OFFICER To, '1 . The V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Kothagudem' Khammam District.

2.TheStationHouseOfficer,KarepallyPoliceStation,KhammamDistrict' g. f*o CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT] +. One CC to Sri C. Damodar Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

5. Two CD CoPies $vy

HIGH COURT DATED: 1510412021 'rAfr- € l-\ q'

co r29 APB 2021 t'

ORDER

<\ CRLP.No.2648 ot 2021 REJECTING THE CRIMINAL PETITION n7tri T